Investigation of Cysteine as an Activator of Side-Chain N→S Acyl Transfer and Tail-to-Side-Chain Cyclization

Durbis J. Castillo-Pazos; Derek Macmillan

doi:10.1055/s-0036-1590797

Synlett, Table of Contents

Synlett 2017; 28(15): 1923-1928
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1590797

cluster

Investigation of Cysteine as an Activator of Side-Chain N→S Acyl Transfer and Tail-to-Side-Chain Cyclization

Authors

Durbis J. Castillo-Pazos

Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AJ, UK Email: d.macmillan@ucl.ac.uk
Derek Macmillan *

Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AJ, UK Email: d.macmillan@ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

All articles of this category

Published as part of the Cluster Recent Advances in Protein and Peptide Synthesis

Abstract

N→S Acyl transfer is a popular method for the postsynthesis production of peptide C _α-thioesters for use in native chemical ligation and for the synthesis of head-to-tail cyclic peptides. Meanwhile thioester formation at the side chain of aspartic or glutamic acids, leading to tail-to-side-chain-cyclized species, is less common. Herein we explore the potential for cysteine to function as a latent thioester when appended to the side chain of glutamic acid. Initial insights gained through study of C-terminal β-alanine as a model for the increased chain length were ultimately applied to peptide macrocyclization. Our results emphasize the increased barrier to acyl transfer at the glutamic acid side chain and indicate how a slow reaction, facilitated by cysteine itself, may be accelerated by fine-tuning of the stereoelectronic environment.

Key words

cyclic peptides - native chemical ligation - acyl transfer

Full Text

References

References and Notes

1a Northfield SE. Wang CK. Schroeder CI. Durek T. Kan M.-W. Swedberg JE. Craik DJ. Eur J. Med. Chem. 2014; 77: 248
1b Poth AG. Chan LY. Craik DJ. Pept. Sci. 2013; 100: 480
1c Young TS. Young DD. Ahmad I. Louis JM. Benkovic SJ. Schultz PG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011; 108: 11052

2a White CJ. Yudin AK. Nat. Chem. 2011; 3: 509
2b Yudin AK. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 30

3a Camarero JA. Cotton GJ. Adeva A. Muir TW. J. Peptide Res. 1998; 51: 303
3b Tam JP. Lu Y.-A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997; 38: 5599
3c Tavassoli A. Benkovic SJ. Nat. Protoc. 2007; 2: 1126
3d Jagadish K. Gould A. Borra R. Majumder S. Mushtaq Z. Shekhtman A. Camarero JA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 8390
3e Nguyen GK. T. Qiu Y. Cao Y. Hemu X. Liu C.-F. Tam JP. Nat. Protoc. 2016; 11: 1977
3f Palei S. Mootz HD. ChemBioChem. 2016; 17: 378
3g Jia X. Kwon S. Wang C.-IA. Huang Y.-H. Chan LY. Tan CC. Rosengren KJ. Mulvenna JP. Schroeder CI. Craik DJ. J. Biol. Chem. 2014; 289: 6627
3h Harris KS. Durek T. Kaas Q. Poth AG. Gilding EK. Conlan BF. Saska I. Daly NL. van der Weerden NL. Craik DJ. Anderson MA. Nat. Commun. 2015; 6: 10199
3i Iwane Y. Hitomi A. Murakami H. Katoh T. Goto Y. Suga H. Nat. Chem. 2016; 8: 317
3j Passioura T. Suga H. Chem. Commun. 2017; 53: 1931

4a Macmillan D. Synlett 2017; 28: in press ; DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1588789
4b Melnyk O. Agouridas V. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2014; 22: 137
4c Zheng J.-S. Tang S. Huang Y.-C. Liu L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013; 46: 2475

5a Adams AL. Macmillan D. J. Pept. Sci. 2013; 19: 65
5b Chen W. Kinsler VA. Macmillan D. Di W.-L. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0166268
5c Macmillan D. De Cecco M. Reynolds NL. Santos LF. A. Barran PE. Dorin JR. ChemBioChem. 2011; 12: 2133
5d Cowper B. Shariff L. Chen W. Gibson SM. Di W.-L. Macmillan D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 7469

6a Cowper B. Craik DJ. Macmillan D. ChemBioChem. 2013; 14: 809
6b Shariff L. Zhu Y. Cowper B. Di W.-L. Macmillan D. Tetrahedron 2014; 70: 7675

7a Hegemann JD. Zimmermann M. Xie X. Marahiel MA. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015; 48: 1909
7b Al Toma RS. Kuthning A. Exner MP. Denisiuk A. Ziegler J. Budisa N. Süssmuth RD. ChemBioChem. 2015; 16: 503

8 Boll E. Dheur J. Drobecq H. Melnyk O. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 2222

9a Boll E. Drobecq H. Lissy E. Cantrelle F.-X. Melnyk O. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 3842
9b Raibaut L. Drobecq H. Melnyk O. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 3636

10 Nguyen DP. Elliott T. Holt M. Muir TW. Chin JW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 11418
11 See Supporting Information for full experimental details.
12 Burlina F. Papageorgiou G. Morris C. White PD. Offer J. Chem. Sci. 2014; 5: 766

13a Adams AL. Cowper B. Morgan RE. Premdjee B. Caddick S. Macmillan D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 13062
13b Li Y.-M. Li Y.-T. Pan M. Kong X.-Q. Huang Y.-C. Hong Z.-Y. Liu L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 2198
13c Zheng J.-S. Tang S. Guo Y. Chang H.-N. Liu L. ChemBioChem. 2012; 13: 542
13d Fang G.-M. Li Y.-M. Shen F. Huang Y.-C. Li J.-B. Lin Y. Cui H.-K. Liu L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 7645

14 Shin HJ. Matsuda H. Murakami M. Yamaguchi K. Tetrahedron 1996; 52: 13129
15 Hudlický M. J. Fluorine Chem. 1993; 60: 193
16 Konas DW. Coward JK. J. Org. Chem. 2001; 66: 8831
17 Buckingham F. Kirjavainen AK. Forsback S. Krzyczmonik A. Keller T. Newington IM. Glaser M. Luthra SK. Solin O. Gouverneur V. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 13564
18 Richardson JP. Chan C.-H. Blanc J. Saadi M. Macmillan D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010; 8: 1351
19 Haag T. Hughes RA. Ritter G. Schmidt RR. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 6016
20 Synthesis of Dipeptides 15a,b Cysteine derivative 14a (0.437 g, 1.04 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂ (6.0 mL). Fmoc-Glu-OAll (0.512 g, 1.25 mmol) and pyBOP (0.595 g, 1.5 mmol) were added, followed by DIPEA (0.362 mL, 2.1 mmol), and the reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 1 h. The reaction mixture was then diluted with EtOAc (50 mL) and washed with sat. aq KHSO₄ (1 × 15 mL) and sat. aq NaHCO₄ (2 × 15 mL). The organic phase was separated, dried (MgSO₄), and evaporated to afford the crude product as a white foam. Purification by flash column chromatography over silica, eluent toluene–EtOAc (5:1) afforded 15a (0.719 g; 85%) as a white foam. Dipeptide 15a ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.76 (2 H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 × ArH), 7.62 (2 H, d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 × ArH), 7.44–7.15 (ca. 19 H, m (overlapped by CDCl₃ signal), ArH ), 6.15 (1 H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, CH allyl), 5.93–5.85 (1 H, m, CH allyl), 5.74 (1 H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, CH allyl), 5.35–5.24 (2 H, 2 × d, 2 × NH), 4.64 (2 H, s (br), CH₂-allyl), 4.52–4.50 (1 H, m, CH_α), 4.43–4.38 (3 H, m, CH_α, CH₂-Fmoc), 4.23 (1 H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, CH-Fmoc), 2.79–2.54 (2 H, m CH_2β-cys), 2.33–1.97 (4 H, m, CH_2β-Glu and CH_2γ-Glu), 1.45 (9 H, s, tBu). ESI⁺-MS: m/z calced for C₄₉H₅₀N₂O₇S: 810.33; found: 811.5 Da [MH]⁺ and 833.5 Da [MNa]⁺. Dipeptide 15b Procedure as above, 53% isolated as a white foam. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.78 (2 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 × ArH), 7.61 (2 H, d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 × ArH), 7.42–7.17 (ca. 19 H, m (overlapped by CDCl₃ signal), ArH ), 6.39 (1 H, s (br), CH allyl), 5.86–5.83 (2 H, m, 2 × CH allyl), 5.35–5.21 (2 H, 2 × d, 2 × NH), 4.63 (2 H, d (br), CH₂-allyl) 4.42–4.37 (3 H, m, CH_α-Glu, CH₂-Fmoc) 4.23 (1 H, t (br), CH-Fmoc), 3.04 (1 H, d, J = 11.3 Hz, half CH_2β-αMeCys), 2.60 (1 H, d, J = 11.3 Hz, half CH_2β-αMeCys), 2.36–2.05 (4 H, m, CH_2β-Glu and CH_2γ-Glu), 1.45 (12 H, s (br), CH₃, tBu). ESI⁺-MS: m/z calcd for C₅₀H₅₂N₂O₇S: 824.35; found: 825.5 Da [MH]⁺ and 847.5 Da [MNa]⁺.
21 Hang J. Li H. Deng L. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 3321
22 Bayro MJ. Mukhopadhyay J. Swapna GV. T. Huang JY. Ma L.-C. Sineva E. Dawson PE. Montelione GT. Ebright RH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 12382
23 Lyophilized peptide 18 was dissolved in ddH₂O to a final concentration of 2 mg/mL; 0.5 mL was transferred to a sterile Eppendorf tube and water (0.3 mL) was added followed by 1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.8, 0.1 mL), TCEP·HCl (5 mg), and sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (MESNa, 0.1 g). The reaction mixture was shaken (700 rpm) in an Eppendorf thermomixer at 50 °C for 24 h. The cyclic peptide was then purified from the reaction mixture by preparative HPLC; t _R= 26.5 min, and lyophilized to afford the pure product as fluffy white solid. ESI⁺-MS: m/z calcd: 912.4; found: 913.2 Da [MH]⁺.
24 Sohma Y. Hua Q.-X. Whittaker J. Weiss MA. Kent SB. H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 5489

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information (PDF)